Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Hyundai Santa Fe 4 facelift vs Nissan Murano 3
Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
1.6 Hybrid AWD
1.6 T-GDI Hybrid AWD
1.6 T-GDI Hybrid
2.2 CRDi AWD DCT
2.2 CRDi DCT
2.5 191
2.5 191 AWD
2.5 277 DCT
2.5 277 AWD DCT
2.5 Hybrid AWD
3.5
3.5 AWD
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
6.3 L / 6.7 qt
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5 / 7
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
15.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
24.4 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R18, 235/55 R20
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
175 mm / 6.9 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4785 mm / 188.4 in
4897 mm / 192.8 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
1900 mm / 74.8 in
1915 mm / 75.4 in
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1641.0 mm / 64.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
1641.0 mm / 64.6 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2824 mm / 111.2 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.9 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
0.31
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Towing Capacity
680 kg / 1499 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
CVT
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
58%
24%
Pros
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Cheap to purchase
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Poor CVT
- Low build quality
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.