Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Land Rover Freelander 2 vs Range Rover Evoque Coupe
Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
2.0 GTDi AWD AT
2.2 eD4
2.2 SD4 AWD AT
2.2 TD4 150 AWD
2.2 TD4 150 AWD AT
2.2 TD4 160
2.2 TD4 160 AT
3.2
Si4 240PS AWD 6AT
Si4 240PS AWD 9AT
Si4 285PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS
TD4 150PS AWD
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 180PS AWD
TD4 180PS AWD AT
eD4
SD4 190PS AWD
SD4 190PS 4WD 6AT
SD4 190PS AWD 9AT
TD4 150PS AWD AT
TD4 150PS AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
755 L / 26.7 cu-ft ~ 1670 L / 59.0 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
735 kg / 1620 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/75 R16
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
3-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
215 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4500 mm / 177.2 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1611.0 mm / 63.4 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
1629.0 mm / 64.1 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
Performance
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
21%
8%
Pros
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability (rare for an LR)
- So ugly that many thought it had character
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Rather ugly
- Very tight inside
- Low cargo capacity
- Bad drivetrain
- MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad ZF 9HP transmission
- Pretends to be "SUV"
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.