Compare Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Audi Q7 II vs Volvo XC90 II facelift
Variants
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI 249
3.0 TDI 272
3.0 TFSI
3.0 ultra TDI 218
45 TDI MHEV
50 TDI MHEV
e-tron 3.0 TDI
B5 235
B5 235 6-7 Seat
B5 250
B5 250 7 Seat
B6
B6 6-7 Seat
Recharge T8
T5
T5 7 Seat
T6
T6 6-7 Seat
T8 4 Seat
T8 6-7 Seat
Capacity
Passengers
5
5 / 7
Payload
723 kg / 1594 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Breakover Angle
13.1 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
31.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Tire Size
235/55 R19, 275/45 R20, 275/35 R22
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
250 mm / 9.8 in
450 mm / 17.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
17.3 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
223 mm / 8.8 in
Size | Height
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1776 mm / 69.9 in
Size | Length
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4953 mm / 195.0 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
1968 mm / 77.5 in | 2212 mm / 87.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
1679.0 mm / 66.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
1691.0 mm / 66.6 in
Weight
2227.0 kg / 4909.7 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2994 mm / 117.9 in
2984 mm / 117.5 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Geartronic
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
74%
67%
Pros
- Some interesting engine options
- More reliable than the bigger RRs
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low official fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Great comfort
- Some offroad capabilities
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- No more 8+ cylinder models
- Somewhat generic styling
- Only available with small engines
- Reliability concerns
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.