Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Volvo XC90 II facelift vs Ford Escape 4
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
B5 235
B5 235 6-7 Seat
B5 250
B5 250 7 Seat
B6
B6 6-7 Seat
Recharge T8
T5
T5 7 Seat
T6
T6 6-7 Seat
T8 4 Seat
T8 6-7 Seat
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 120
1.5 EcoBoost 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.5 Duratec 190 AWD CVT
2.5 Duratec 225 PHEV CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
723 kg / 1594 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
235/55 R19, 275/45 R20, 275/35 R22
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Trim Levels
S, SE, SE Sport, SEL, Titanium
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
223 mm / 8.8 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1776 mm / 69.9 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4953 mm / 195.0 in
4614 mm / 181.7 in
Track Width | Front
1597.0 mm / 62.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Weight
2227.0 kg / 4909.7 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2984 mm / 117.5 in
2710 mm / 106.7 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic
Production
Debut
2019-04
Made In
USA
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
67%
17%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Great comfort
- Some offroad capabilities
- Good towing capacity
- Low fuel consumption
- Cheap to purchase
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Only available with small engines
- Reliability concerns
- Crossover nonsense
- PHEV nonsense
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.