Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Volvo XC60 II vs Ford Escape 4

Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 120
1.5 EcoBoost 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.5 Duratec 190 AWD CVT
2.5 Duratec 225 PHEV CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
21.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
23.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
18.8 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Trim Levels
S, SE, SE Sport, SEL, Titanium

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
216 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1658 mm / 65.3 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4614 mm / 181.7 in
Track Width | Front
1597.0 mm / 62.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2710 mm / 106.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
18.6 km / 11.6 mi

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic

Production

Availability
2017
Debut
2019-04
Made In
USA

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
57%
17%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Cheap to purchase
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Crossover nonsense
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.