Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Audi Q3 F3 vs Audi Q5 Sportback
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI Euro6d
35 TFSI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI Euro6d quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
35 TDI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
50 TDI quattro AT
50 TFSI e quattro DCT
55 TFSI e quattro DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Chassis Type
Unitary steel/aluminum composite construction
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
19.9 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
17.6 deg
21.1 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Steering Ratio
15:9
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
17.9 kWh (gross) | 14.4 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
381.0 V
Platform
MLB evo
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4689 mm / 184.6 in
Size | Width
1893 mm / 74.5 in | 2140 mm / 84.3 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2680 mm / 105.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
61.0 km / 37.9 mi
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Production
Debut
2020-11
Made In
Germany, China, Algeria
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
37%
50%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Crossover nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Hunchback crossover nonsense
- Ugly and impractical
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.