Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Range Rover Velar L560 facelift vs Volvo XC90 II facelift

Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
D200
P250
P400e
D300
P340
P400
B5 235
B5 235 6-7 Seat
B5 250
B5 250 7 Seat
B6
B6 6-7 Seat
Recharge T8
T5
T5 7 Seat
T6
T6 6-7 Seat
T8 4 Seat
T8 6-7 Seat

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
723 kg / 1594 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
235/55 R19, 275/45 R20, 275/35 R22
Water Fording
530 mm / 20.9 in
450 mm / 17.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
223 mm / 8.8 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1678 mm / 66.1 in
1776 mm / 69.9 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4797 mm / 188.9 in
4953 mm / 195.0 in
Size | Width
2147 mm / 84.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 2041 mm / 80.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1657.0 mm / 65.2 in
Weight
2227.0 kg / 4909.7 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2984 mm / 117.5 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
53.0 km / 32.9 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Geartronic

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
67%
67%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Some interesting engine options
  • More reliable than the bigger RRs
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Great comfort
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Reliability concerns

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.