Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Renault Captur 2 vs Renault Koleos 2

Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 91
1.3 TCe 130 DCT
1.3 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 154 AT
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 AT
1.5 dCi 95
E-TECH 143
E-TECH 160
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi CVT
2.0 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi 4x4
2.0 dCi 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi CVT
2.5 4x4 CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
210 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1673 mm / 65.9 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4227 mm / 166.4 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2063 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1864 mm / 73.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2639 mm / 103.9 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.353
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
50.0 km / 31.1 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
80.0 mm / 3.1 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
3%
28%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Coherent exterior design
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very ugly
  • Poor build quality
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.