Compare Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551) vs Renault Captur 2 vs Renault Koleos / Samsung QM5 (HY)

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

Renault Captur 2

Renault Koleos / Samsung QM5 (HY)

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)Renault Captur 2Renault Koleos / Samsung QM5 (HY)
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 91
1.3 TCe 130 DCT
1.3 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 154 AT
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 AT
1.5 dCi 95
E-TECH 143
E-TECH 160
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 173 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 175 Euro5 4x4
2.5 170
2.5 170 4x4
2.5 170 4x4 CVT
2.5 170 CVT

Reviews

Neofiliac score27%3%23%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Relatively adequate engines
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very ugly
  • Poor build quality
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.