Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Audi Q7 II vs Audi Q5 facelift
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI 249
3.0 TDI 272
3.0 TFSI
3.0 ultra TDI 218
45 TDI MHEV
50 TDI MHEV
e-tron 3.0 TDI
2.0 TDI 143 quattro
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 quattro
2.0 TDI 177 quattro
2.0 TDI 177 quattro DCT
2.0 TDI 190 DCT
2.0 TDI 163 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 180 quattro
2.0 TFSI 225 quattro
2.0 TFSI 225 quattro AT
2.0 TFSI 230 quattro
2.0 TFSI 230 quattro AT
2.0 TFSI Hybrid quattro AT
3.0 TDI 245 quattro DCT
3.0 TDI 258 quattro DCT
3.0 TFSI 272 quattro AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
540 L / 19.1 cu-ft ~ 1560 L / 55.1 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5 / 7
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
25.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
13.1 deg
17.6 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
31.0 deg
31.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link on trapezoidal lever
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.3 kWh (gross)
1.3 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
210 mm / 8.3 in
200 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1655 mm / 65.2 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4629 mm / 182.2 in
Size | Width
1968 mm / 77.5 in | 2212 mm / 87.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1898 mm / 74.7 in | 2089 mm / 82.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1679.0 mm / 66.1 in
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1691.0 mm / 66.6 in
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2994 mm / 117.9 in
2807 mm / 110.5 in
Performance
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
74%
49%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low official fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Improved engine output
- Some offroad capabilities
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No more 8+ cylinder models
- Somewhat generic styling
- Still questionable styling
- Questionable DCT reliability
- Hybrid nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.