CrossoverAudi49% by Neofiliac Team

Audi Q5 (8R) facelift

Compact Crossover

Product Gallery

Photo 0of Audi Q5 (8R) faceliftPhoto 1of Audi Q5 (8R) faceliftPhoto 2of Audi Q5 (8R) faceliftPhoto 3of Audi Q5 (8R) faceliftPhoto 4of Audi Q5 (8R) faceliftPhoto 5of Audi Q5 (8R) faceliftPhoto 6of Audi Q5 (8R) faceliftPhoto 7of Audi Q5 (8R) faceliftPhoto 8of Audi Q5 (8R) facelift

Product Overview

Audi Q5 (Typ 8R) facelift is a compact crossover in production from 2012 to 2016. It was available with a range of inline-4 and V6 engines that displaced 2.0 to 3.0 liters.
Compared to the pre-facelift model, the facelifted Q5 introduces minor visual updates and a slight bump in engine output. At the same time, Audi continued to use broadly the S tronic DCT.
Drivers who appreciate handling will be pleased to know that the Audi Q5 comes with multi-link suspensions at all four corners. This provides the best cornering performance and tunability, at the expense of cost and a little bit of durability.

Ratings

What we found

Neofiliac score 49%
Pros
  • Improved engine output
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Still questionable styling
  • Questionable DCT reliability
  • Hybrid nonsense

Your rating:

12345678910
?/10

Price Comparison

As associates of the merchants above, we earn a commission when you make a purchase using the supplied links.

Specifications

Variants shown:
2.0 TDI 143 quattro
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 quattro
2.0 TDI 177 quattro
2.0 TDI 177 quattro DCT
2.0 TDI 190 DCT
2.0 TDI 163 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 180 quattro
2.0 TFSI 225 quattro
2.0 TFSI 225 quattro AT
2.0 TFSI 230 quattro
2.0 TFSI 230 quattro AT
2.0 TFSI Hybrid quattro AT
3.0 TDI 245 quattro DCT
3.0 TDI 258 quattro DCT
3.0 TFSI 272 quattro AT

Related Products

Audi Q5 (8R)
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Good towing capacity
· 44%
Volkswagen Tiguan (5N) facelift
  • Some offroad capabilities
· 34%
Volkswagen Tiguan (5N)
  • Some offroad capabilities
· 28%
Jaguar E-Pace (X540)
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent styling
· 37%
Renault Koleos / Samsung QM5 (HY)
  • Relatively adequate engines
· 23%
Honda CR-V 3 (RE)
  • Improved styling
  • Great engine reliability
  • Good manual transmission
· 33%
Ford Kuga (C394)
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
· 17%
Nissan X-Trail (T30)
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
· 29%
Mazda CX-5 II (KF)
  • Good engine lineup
  • Decent build quality
· 40%
Kia Sportage 3 (SL)
  • Marginal offroad capabilities
· 26%
Kia Sportage 4 (QL)
  • Improved fuel efficiency
  • Marginal capabilities
· 42%
Hyundai Tucson (JM)
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
· 31%

<

>

x