Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Renault Koleos 2 vs Renault Captur

Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi CVT
2.0 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi 4x4
2.0 dCi 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi CVT
2.5 4x4 CVT
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
210 mm / 8.3 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1673 mm / 65.9 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4122 mm / 162.3 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2063 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1864 mm / 73.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.353
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
80.0 mm / 3.1 in
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
28%
1%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Coherent exterior design
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Both ugly and forgettable

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.