Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Audi Q5 Sportback vs Audi Q5
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
35 TDI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
50 TDI quattro AT
50 TFSI e quattro DCT
55 TFSI e quattro DCT
2.0 TDI quattro
2.0 TFSI 180 quattro
2.0 TFSI 211 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 211 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 245 quattro AT
3.0 TDI quattro DCT
3.2 FSI quattro DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Chassis Type
Unitary steel/aluminum composite construction
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.9 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
21.1 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Steering Ratio
15:9
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link, trapezoidal lever
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.9 kWh (gross) | 14.4 kWh (net)
1.3 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
381.0 V
Platform
MLB evo
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
200 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1653 mm / 65.1 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4689 mm / 184.6 in
4629 mm / 182.2 in
Size | Width
1893 mm / 74.5 in | 2140 mm / 84.3 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1613.0 mm / 63.5 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2807 mm / 110.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
0.33
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Production
Debut
2020-11
Made In
Germany, China, Algeria
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
50%
44%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Multi-link suspensions all-around
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Hunchback crossover nonsense
- Ugly and impractical
- Some questionable styling elements
- Unreliable petrol engines
- Unreliable DCTs
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.