Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Hyundai Tucson 4 vs Peugeot 3008 II

Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 Hybrid AWD AT
1.6 PHEV AWD AT
1.6 T-GDI 150
1.6 T-GDI 150 AWD
1.6 T-GDI 150 MHEV
1.6 T-GDI 150 MHEV DCT
1.6 T-GDI 180
1.6 T-GDI 180 MHEV AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDI 230 Hybrid AT
1.6 T-GDI Hybrid AWD AT
1.6 T-GDi PHEV AWD AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AWD AT
1.2 130 AT
1.2 130
1.5 HDi 130 AT
1.5 HDi 130
1.6 HDi 100
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 180 AT
1.6 PHEV
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 HDi 150
GT 2.0 HDi 177
GT 2.0 HDi 180

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1482 L / 52.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.4 deg
20.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
25.7 deg
29.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.7 m / 35.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.2 kWh (gross)
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
Compact crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
925 mm
219 mm / 8.6 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4447 mm / 175.1 in
Size | Width
1841 mm / 72.5 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1906 mm / 75.0 in (mirror folded)
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
56.0 km / 34.8 mi

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in

Production

Debut
2020-09-15
Made In
Korea, China, Brazil, India, Russia...

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
31%
21%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Some towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Rather ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.