Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Jeep Compass 2 vs Jeep Renegade

Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.3 130
1.3 150 DCT
1.3 190 4xe AT
1.3 240 4xe AT
1.4 MultiAir 140
1.4 MultiAir 170 4x4 AT
1.6 Multijet 120
1.6 Multijet 130
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4 AT
2.0 Multijet 170 4x4 AT
1.4 MultiAir2 140 DCT
1.4 MultiAir2 140
1.4 MultiAir2 170 4x4 AT
1.6 e-torq
1.6 MultiJet
2.0 MultiJet 140 4x4 AT
2.0 MultiJet 140 4x4
2.0 MultiJet 170 4x4 AT
2.4 MultiAir2 AT
2.4 MultiAir2 4x4 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
351 L / 12.4 cu-ft ~ 1297 L / 45.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
540 kg / 1190 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Trailing arm
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.3 ft
Water Fording
406 mm / 16.0 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4236 mm / 166.8 in
Size | Width
1805 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2636 mm / 103.8 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi

Powertrain

Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2017
2014 ~ 2018
Debut
2016 LA International Auto Show
Made In
Mexico, Brazil, China, India, Italy

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
12%
15%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Marginal offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Affordable pricing
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic chassis and suspension setup
  • Ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.