Compare Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Audi Q3 Sportback F3 vs BMW X3 G01 LCI
Variants
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
20d
20i
30d
30e
30i
M40d
M40i
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
25.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
17.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
225/60 R18 104W XL
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
Compact Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
204 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1676 mm / 66.0 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2864 mm / 112.8 in
Performance
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
61.0 km / 37.9 mi
42.0 km / 26.1 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine
B48B20
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2018-07-25
2021-06-09
Made In
Hungary, China
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
32%
57%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Low fuel consumption
- Good marketing
- Decent performance
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Impractical and ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Tiny engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Crossover nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.