HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare BMW X2 F39 vs Peugeot 5008 II vs Peugeot 2008

Variants
sDrive18d
sDrive18d AT
xDrive18d
xDrive18d AT
sDrive18i
sDrive18i AT
sDrive20d AT
xDrive20d AT
sDrive20i AT
sDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive20i AT
xDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25e AT
M35i AT
1.2 130
1.2 130 AT
1.2 130 Euro6d
1.2 130 Euro6d AT
1.5 HDi 130 Euro6d
1.6 180 AT
1.6 HDi 100
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 177 AT
2.0 HDi 180 AT
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
780 L / 27.5 cu-ft ~ 1940 L / 68.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
10.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
295.0 V
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
236 mm / 9.3 in
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1646 mm / 64.8 in
1556 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4360 mm / 171.7 in
4641 mm / 182.7 in
4159 mm / 163.7 in
Size | Width
1844 mm / 72.6 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1906 mm / 75.0 in (mirror folded)
1739 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2537 mm / 99.9 in

Performance

Electric Range
57.0 km / 35.4 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
34%
24%
2%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Beautiful interior
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent exterior design
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to fix
Cons
  • Ugly styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly indeed
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.