Compare Hyundai Nexo vs Mercedes GLC-Class X253 vs Mercedes GLE Coupe C167
Variants
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT
AMG GLE 53
AMG GLE 63 S
AMG GLE 63
GLE 350d
GLE 350de
GLE 350e
GLE 400d
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft ~ 1466 L / 51.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
451 kg / 994 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.9 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.1 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/60 R17, 245/45 R19
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.6 kWh (gross)
13.5 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door hydrogen fuel cell SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
162 mm / 6.4 in
123 mm / 4.8 in
Size | Height
1630 mm / 64.2 in
Size | Length
4670 mm / 183.9 in
Size | Width
1860 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Weight
1889.0 kg / 4164.5 lbs
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17, 7.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2790 mm / 109.8 in
2873 mm / 113.1 in
2935 mm / 115.6 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.7 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
0.33
0.35
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
177.0 km/h / 110.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Power
163 hp / 121.5 kW
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Type
hydrogen engine
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
Transmission | Type
CVT
Automatic 9G-Tronic
Production
Availability
2018
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
43%
60%
71%
Pros
- Powered by zero-emission hydrogen fuel cell
- Great V8 in the 63AMG models
- Cleaner exterior styling
- Low official fuel consumption
- Available with the M177 V8
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Poor performance
- Poor suspension setup
- Most engines are lethargic
- Fuel-cell not widely available
- Hunchback crossover nonsense
- Very ugly and pompous
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.