Compare Infiniti QX50 II vs Honda Pilot vs Honda CR-V 5
Variants
AWD
FWD
3.5 243 AWD
3.5 248
3.5 248 AWD
3.5 258 AWD
1.5 173
1.5 173 AWD
1.5 190 AWD CVT
1.5 190 CVT
1.5 193 AWD CVT
1.6d 120 AT
1.6d 120 AWD AT
1.6d 160 AWD
1.6d 160 AWD AT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 Hybrid AWD
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d AWD
2.4 AWD CVT
2.4 CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
895 L / 31.6 cu-ft ~ 1699 L / 60.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.1 L / 9.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
8
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 300 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc, 312 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/55 R19, 255/45 R20
235/70 R16
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
218 mm / 8.6 in
Size | Height
1679 mm / 66.1 in
Size | Length
4693 mm / 184.8 in
4775 mm / 188.0 in
Size | Width
1903 mm / 74.9 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 19, 8.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2800 mm / 110.2 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.8 sec
Top Speed
230.0 km/h / 142.9 mph
Towing Capacity
1361 kg / 3000 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
ULEV-2
Engine
J35A6
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.0:1
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
3.5 L / 211.8 cu-in / 3471.0 cc
Engine | Power
272.0 hp / 202.8 kW @ 5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
136.2 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
380 Nm / 280.3 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct- and multi-port-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
XTRONIC
Automatic
Production
Availability
2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
53%
32%
41%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Good interior design
- Reliable engine
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Good engine reliability
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No longer RWD-based
- CVT
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Boring design
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible CVT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.