Compare Peugeot 2008 II vs Renault Megane E-Tech Electric vs Renault Captur
Variants
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
EV40
EV60
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door battery-electric SUV
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1500 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4300 mm / 169.3 in
4210 mm / 165.7 in
4122 mm / 162.3 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheelbase
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.4 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.0 sec
Electric Range
330.0 km / 205.1 mi
Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Bore
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
21%
1%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Up to 470km electric range
- Decent styling
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Poor performance
- Low build quality
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- BEV crossover nonsense
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Both ugly and forgettable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.