Compare Peugeot 2008 II vs Volvo XC90 II facelift vs Volvo XC40

Variants
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
B5 235
B5 235 6-7 Seat
B5 250
B5 250 7 Seat
B6
B6 6-7 Seat
Recharge T8
T5
T5 7 Seat
T6
T6 6-7 Seat
T8 4 Seat
T8 6-7 Seat
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
Payload
723 kg / 1594 lbs

Chassis

Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Tire Size
235/55 R19, 275/45 R20, 275/35 R22
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
450 mm / 17.7 in

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
223 mm / 8.8 in
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1776 mm / 69.9 in
Size | Length
4300 mm / 169.3 in
4953 mm / 195.0 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Weight
2227.0 kg / 4909.7 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2984 mm / 117.5 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
330.0 km / 205.1 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
21%
67%
32%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Great comfort
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Only available with small engines
  • Reliability concerns
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.