Compare Peugeot 2008 II vs DS 3 Crossback vs Renault Captur
Variants
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.5 BlueHDi 110
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-Tense
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft ~ 1050 L / 37.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
3.5 L / 3.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross) | 47.5 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1534 mm / 60.4 in
Size | Length
4300 mm / 169.3 in
4118 mm / 162.1 in
4122 mm / 162.3 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheelbase
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2558 mm / 100.7 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in
Performance
Electric Range
330.0 km / 205.1 mi
430.0 km / 267.2 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine
YH01
Engine | Bore
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
8%
1%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Poor performance
- Low build quality
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Ugly
- Poor performance
- Only available with tiny engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Poor handling
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Both ugly and forgettable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.