Compare Peugeot 2008 II vs Hyundai Kona vs Hyundai Nexo
Variants
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
1.0 T-GDi
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDi 141 Hybrid DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 AWD DCT
2.0 150 AT
2.0 150 AWD AT
39 kWh Electric
39.2 kWh Electric
64 kWh (204 Hp) Electric
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft ~ 1466 L / 51.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
451 kg / 994 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/60 R17, 245/45 R19
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door hydrogen fuel cell SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
162 mm / 6.4 in
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1630 mm / 64.2 in
Size | Length
4300 mm / 169.3 in
4670 mm / 183.9 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)
1860 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Weight
1889.0 kg / 4164.5 lbs
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17, 7.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2790 mm / 109.8 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.2 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.7 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
330.0 km / 205.1 mi
Top Speed
177.0 km/h / 110.0 mph
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine
Kappa
Engine | Power
163 hp / 121.5 kW
Engine | Type
hydrogen engine
Transmission | Type
CVT
Production
Availability
2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
21%
43%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low official fuel consumption
- Powered by zero-emission hydrogen fuel cell
Cons
- Poor performance
- Low build quality
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Independent rear suspensions only for AWD model
- Poor performance
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.