Compare Volvo XC40 vs Audi Q7 II (4M) facelift vs Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)

Volvo XC40

Audi Q7 II (4M) facelift

Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)

Volvo XC40Audi Q7 II (4M) faceliftAudi Q3 Sportback (F3)
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
45 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro 7 seat
50 TDI quattro
50 TDI quattro 7 seat
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro
55 TFSI quattro 7 seat
60 TFSI e quattro
60 TFSI e quattro
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%73%32%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good marketing
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • The A6 Avant is much better all-around
  • Uglified front-end
  • Impractical and ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.