Compare Volvo XC40 vs Audi Q5 II (FY/80A) facelift vs Audi Q3 F3

Volvo XC40

Audi Q5 II (FY/80A) facelift

Audi Q3 F3

Volvo XC40Audi Q5 II (FY/80A) faceliftAudi Q3 F3
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
35 TDI DCT
40 TDI quattro ultra DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro ultra DCT
50 TDI quattro AT
50 TFSI e quattro DCT
55 TFSI e quattro DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI Euro6d
35 TFSI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI Euro6d quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%56%37%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • No powerful engine options
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.