Compare Volvo XC40 vs BMW X2 F39 vs Audi Q5 II (80A)

Volvo XC40

BMW X2 F39

Audi Q5 II (80A)

Volvo XC40BMW X2 F39Audi Q5 II (80A)
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
sDrive18d
sDrive18d AT
xDrive18d
xDrive18d AT
sDrive18i
sDrive18i AT
sDrive20d AT
xDrive20d AT
sDrive20i AT
sDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive20i AT
xDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25e AT
M35i AT
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 163 quattro DCT
2.0 TDI 190 quattro
2.0 TDI 190 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 252 quattro DCT
3.0 TDI quattro AT
35 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI quattro
40 TDI quattro DCT
45 TDI quattro AT
45 TFSI quatrro DCT
50 TDI quattro AT
50 TFSI e PHEV quattro DCT
55 TFSI e PHEV quattro DCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%34%57%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Same exterior styling as Mk1

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.