Compare Volvo XC40 vs Hyundai Kona (OS) vs Audi Q2 (GA)

Volvo XC40

Hyundai Kona (OS)

Audi Q2 (GA)

Volvo XC40Hyundai Kona (OS)Audi Q2 (GA)
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.0 T-GDi
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDi 141 Hybrid DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 AWD DCT
2.0 150 AT
2.0 150 AWD AT
39 kWh Electric
39.2 kWh Electric
64 kWh (204 Hp) Electric
1.0 TFSI
1.0 TFSI DCT
1.4 TFSI
1.4 TFSI quattro
1.4 TFSI DCT
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI DCT
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 quattro DCT
2.0 TDI 150 DCT
2.0 TDI 190 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI quattro DCT
30 TDI
30 TDI DCT
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%21%28%
Pros
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent 4-cylinder engines
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Independent rear suspensions only for AWD model
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Independent rear suspension on in AWD models

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.