Compare Jaguar F-Pace facelift vs Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2 facelift

Variants
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
1.4 TSI eHybrid DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 190 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 245 4MOTION DSG
Tiguan R
1.5 TSI 150 DSG R-Line
2.0 TDI 150 4MOTION DSG R-Line

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
601 L / 21.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
22.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.1 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
500 mm / 19.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.1 kWh (gross)
15.0 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross) | 10.4 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
213 mm / 8.4 in
212 mm / 8.3 in
201 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1648 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4395 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
2175 mm / 85.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 2071 mm / 81.5 in (mirror folded)
1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in

Performance

Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
59.0 km / 36.7 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ZF

Production

Availability
2020
2020
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
68%
35%
19%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engines
  • Down to very low 1.8L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
  • Mid-size crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low build quality
  • Very ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.