Compare Ford Grand C-MAX vs BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 vs Ford C-MAX 2

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 Minivan (2014-2018)

Ford | Cars

BMW | Cars

Ford | Cars

Variants

1.0 EcoBoost 100

1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6

1.0 EcoBoost 125

1.5 EcoBoost 150

1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT

1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT

1.5 TDCi 120

1.5 TDCi 120 AT

1.5 TDCi 95

1.6 TDCi 115

1.6 Ti-VCT 120

2.0 TDCi 150

2.0 TDCi 150 AT

2.0 TDCi 170 AT

214d

216d

218d

218d AT

218i

218i AT

220d

220d AT

220d xDrive AT

220i

220i AT

225i AT

225i xDrive AT

225xe xDrive AT

1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6

1.0 EcoBoost 100

1.0 EcoBoost 125

1.0 EcoBoost 125 Euro6

1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT

1.5 EcoBoost 150

1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT

1.5 ECOnetic 105

1.5 TDCi 120

1.5 TDCi 120 AT

1.5 TDCi 95

1.6 Duratec 105

1.6 Duratec 125

1.6 TDCi 115

1.6 TDCi 95

1.6 EcoBoost 150

1.6 TDCi 115 Euro6

1.6 120

1.6 85

2.0 188 PHEV

2.0 TDCi 140

2.0 TDCi 140 AT

2.0 TDCi 163

2.0 TDCi 163 AT

2.0 TDCi 150 AT

2.0 TDCi 150

2.0 TDCi 170 AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

8.0 L / 8.5 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

4.3 L / 4.5 qt

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

5 / 7

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Disc

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Drum

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Tire Size

205/55 R16, 215/55 R16, 215/50 R17, 235/40 R18

Turning Circle

11.3 m / 37.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

7.6 kWh (gross) | 5.8 kWh (net)

7.6 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Battery | Voltage

293.0 V

Body Style

5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

140 mm / 5.5 in

Size | Length

4342 mm / 170.9 in

Size | Width

1800 mm / 70.9 in

Wheelbase

2670 mm / 105.1 in

2649 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6

Reviews

Neofiliac score

24%

34%

23%

Pros

Decent engine reliability

Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Low official fuel consumption
Lots of space inside

Low fuel consumption

Cons

Poor performance
No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Somewhat ugly

Poor performance
No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.