Compare Ford C-MAX 2 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2 vs BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 LCI

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 Euro6
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT
1.5 ECOnetic 105
1.5 TDCi 120
1.5 TDCi 120 AT
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105
1.6 Duratec 125
1.6 TDCi 115
1.6 TDCi 95
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 TDCi 115 Euro6
1.6 120
1.6 85
2.0 188 PHEV
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 163
2.0 TDCi 163 AT
2.0 TDCi 150 AT
2.0 TDCi 150
2.0 TDCi 170 AT
Pacifica Hybrid
Pacifica
216d
216d DCT
216i
218d
218d AT
218d xDrive
218d xDrive AT
218i Euro6d
218i Euro6d AT
218i
218i DCT
220d AT
220d xDrive AT
220i Euro6d AT
220i DCT
225i xDrive AT
225xe Euro6d xDrive AT
225xe Euro6d-TEMP xDrive AT
225xe xDrive AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
915 L / 32.3 cu-ft ~ 3979 L / 140.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 245/50 R20
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
7.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1777 mm / 70.0 in
Size | Length
5176 mm / 203.8 in
4354 mm / 171.4 in
Size | Width
2022 mm / 79.6 in | 2297 mm / 90.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 7.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2649 mm / 104.3 in
3089 mm / 121.6 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
1633 kg / 3600 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 220.0 cu-in / 3605.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
355 Nm / 261.8 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm

Production

Availability
2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
23%
56%
33%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good styling
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Large interior space
  • Very comfortable
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Lots of space inside for its size
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.