Compare Ford C-MAX 2 vs Mercedes B-class W246 facelift vs Mercedes R-Class W251
Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 Euro6
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT
1.5 ECOnetic 105
1.5 TDCi 120
1.5 TDCi 120 AT
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105
1.6 Duratec 125
1.6 TDCi 115
1.6 TDCi 95
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 TDCi 115 Euro6
1.6 120
1.6 85
2.0 188 PHEV
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 163
2.0 TDCi 163 AT
2.0 TDCi 150 AT
2.0 TDCi 150
2.0 TDCi 170 AT
B 160
B 160 DCT
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI
B 180 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 CDI DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 Natural Gas Drive
B 200 Natural Gas Drive DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
R 280
R 280 CDI
R 280 CDI 4MATIC
R 280 CDI Long
R 280 Long
R 300
R 300 CDI
R 300 CDI 4MATIC
R 300 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
R 300 CDI Long
R 300 Long
R 320 BlueTec Long
R 320 CDI 4MATIC
R 320 CDI Long 4MATIC
R 350
R 350 4MATIC
R 350 4MATIC Long
R 350 CDI 4MATIC
R 350 CDI 4MATIC Long
R 350 Long
R 500 M113 4MATIC
R 500 M113 4MATIC Long
R 500 M273 4MATIC Long
R 63 AMG
R 63 AMG Long
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
7.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
98 mm / 3.9 in
148 mm / 5.8 in
Wheelbase
2649 mm / 104.3 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine | Redline
4500 rpm
Reviews
Neofiliac score
23%
25%
70%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Lots of powerful engine options
- More luxurious than the average minivan
- Great suspension setup
- Great suspension setup
Cons
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- 4MATIC nonsense
- Half-hearted product
- Not very spacious
- Not sliding doors
- Too much 4MATIC nonsense
- Twitchy 7G-Tronic
- Some unreliable engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.