HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford S-MAX 2 facelift vs Toyota Sienna 4 vs Toyota Wish

Variants
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD
2.5 Hybrid
1.8 125 4WD AT
1.8 132 AT
2.0 CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
949 L / 33.5 cu-ft ~ 2860 L / 101.0 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 327.66 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 317.5 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
11.7 m / 38.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.1 kWh (gross)
1.9 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door hybrid Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
155 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Size | Length
5169 mm / 203.5 in
Size | Width
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
1994 mm / 78.5 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1740.0 mm / 68.5 in
Weight
2091.0 kg / 4609.9 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
3061 mm / 120.5 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Towing Capacity
1588 kg / 3501 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
SULEV
Engine
A25A-FXS
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
87.4 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
14.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2487.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
76.0 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
103.4 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Type
direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
e-CVT

Production

Availability
2020
2003 ~ 2009

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
55%
23%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good styling
  • High reliability
  • Good exterior design
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.