Compare Ford S-MAX 2 facelift vs Chrysler Pacifica 2 vs BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45

Variants
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid
Pacifica Hybrid
Pacifica
214d
216d
218d
218d AT
218i
218i AT
220d
220d AT
220d xDrive AT
220i
220i AT
225i AT
225i xDrive AT
225xe xDrive AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
915 L / 32.3 cu-ft ~ 3979 L / 140.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Passengers
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 245/50 R20
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.1 kWh (gross)
7.6 kWh (gross) | 5.8 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
293.0 V

Dimensions

Size | Height
1777 mm / 70.0 in
Size | Length
5176 mm / 203.8 in
4342 mm / 170.9 in
Size | Width
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
2022 mm / 79.6 in | 2297 mm / 90.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1800 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 7.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
3089 mm / 121.6 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Towing Capacity
1633 kg / 3600 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
3.6 L / 220.0 cu-in / 3605.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
355 Nm / 261.8 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm

Production

Availability
2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
56%
34%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Good styling
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Large interior space
  • Very comfortable
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Lots of space inside
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Ugly
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Somewhat ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.