Compare Ford S-MAX 2 facelift vs Mercedes B-class W246 facelift vs Mercedes B-Class W246
Variants
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid
B 160
B 160 DCT
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI
B 180 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 CDI DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 Natural Gas Drive
B 200 Natural Gas Drive DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI (OM651)
B 180 CDI (OM651) DCT
B 180 CDI (OM607)
B 180 CDI (OM607) DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1547 L / 54.6 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Trailing arm
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
98 mm / 3.9 in
Size | Height
1557 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4359 mm / 171.6 in
Size | Width
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
73.7 mm / 2.9 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
24%
25%
24%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Decent engine reliability
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- 4MATIC nonsense
- Half-hearted product
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Poor fit and finish
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.