HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Scenic 4 vs Renault Modus vs Mercedes B-Class W246

Variants
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 160 AT
1.7 dCi 120
1.7 dCi 120 AT
1.7 dCi 150
1.7 dCi 150 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2
1.4
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 88
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI (OM651)
B 180 CDI (OM651) DCT
B 180 CDI (OM607)
B 180 CDI (OM607) DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1547 L / 54.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Trailing arm
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1653 mm / 65.1 in
1589 mm / 62.6 in
1557 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4406 mm / 173.5 in
4359 mm / 171.6 in
Size | Width
1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2128 mm / 83.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1602.0 mm / 63.1 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheel Size
20 in
Wheelbase
2734 mm / 107.6 in
2482 mm / 97.7 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
73.7 mm / 2.9 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
6%
24%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Less ugly than before
Cons
  • Ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • Low build quality
  • Rather bad design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Poor fit and finish

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.