HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Toyota Sienna 4 vs Ford S-MAX 2 facelift vs Ford Galaxy 2

Variants
2.5 Hybrid AWD
2.5 Hybrid
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid
1.8 TDCi 101
1.8 TDCi 125
2.0 AT
2.0
2.0 TDCi 130
2.0 TDCi 140
2.2 TDCi 175
2.3

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
949 L / 33.5 cu-ft ~ 2860 L / 101.0 cu-ft
308 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 2325 L / 82.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 327.66 mm
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 317.5 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.9 m / 39.2 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.9 kWh (gross)
1.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door hybrid Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1723 mm / 67.8 in
Size | Length
5169 mm / 203.5 in
4820 mm / 189.8 in
Size | Width
1994 mm / 78.5 in
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1589.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1740.0 mm / 68.5 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Weight
2091.0 kg / 4609.9 lbs
Wheelbase
3061 mm / 120.5 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Towing Capacity
1588 kg / 3501 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
SULEV
Euro 4
Engine
A25A-FXS
Engine | Bore
87.4 mm / 3.4 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
14.0:1
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2487.0 cc
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
76.0 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
103.4 mm / 4.1 in
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Type
direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
e-CVT

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
55%
24%
47%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good styling
  • High reliability
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent engine reliability
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good automatic transmission
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.