Compare Mercedes C-Class Estate S206 vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake X260 facelift vs BMW 3 Series Touring G21

Variants
C 200 4MATIC AT
C 200 AT
C 220d 4MATIC AT
C 220d AT
C 300d AT
C 300e AT
C 300 4MATIC AT
20d
20d AWD
25t
30t AWD
318d
318d AT
318i AT
320d
320d AT
320d xDrive AT
320e AT
320e xDrive AT
320i AT
330d AT
330d xDrive AT
330d MHEV AT
330d MHEV xDrive AT
330e AT
330e xDrive AT
330i AT
330i xDrive AT
M340d xDrive AT
M340i xDrive AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.0 L / 6.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.7 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
8.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 37.9 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
25.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
97 mm / 3.8 in
Size | Height
1494 mm / 58.8 in
Size | Length
4751 mm / 187.0 in
4964 mm / 195.4 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in | 2033 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
2089 mm / 82.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1982 mm / 78.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1602.0 mm / 63.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
Wheelbase
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2960 mm / 116.5 in
2851 mm / 112.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Electric Range
95.0 km / 59.0 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
9
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic 9G-TRONIC
Automatic ZF

Production

Availability
2021
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
67%
69%
75%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Great styling
  • Good suspension setup
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Great styling
  • Good performance
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Highly competitive in its class
  • Improved suspension setup
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Only available with small engines
  • Long-term reliability concerns
  • Plasticky
  • Complex emission control systems

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.