Compare Volvo V60 II vs Volvo V90 facelift vs Ford Escape 2
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
B4
B6 AWD
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD
D4 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
T8 AWD
2.3 AWD
2.3
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 AWD
2.5
2.5 Hybrid AWD
3.0 AWD
3.0
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1526 L / 53.9 cu-ft
934 L / 33.0 cu-ft ~ 1792 L / 63.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
381 kg / 840 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322-345 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1730 mm / 68.1 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4945 mm / 194.7 in
4480 mm / 176.4 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1845 mm / 72.6 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
Weight
1605.0 kg / 3538.4 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2620 mm / 103.1 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.30 ~ 0.33
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Production
Availability
2020
2008 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
62%
69%
25%
Pros
- Good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Great styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent handling
- Fully independent suspension
- Tough, sporty look
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Limited to low speed
- Only available with small engines
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Poor fit and finish
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.