Compare Volvo V90 facelift vs BMW 5 Series Touring G31 vs Toyota Mark II Blit
Variants
B4
B6 AWD
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD
D4 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
T8 AWD
520d Mild Hybrid
520d Mild Hybrid AT
520d Mild Hybrid xDrive AT
520d AT
520d xDrive AT
520i AT
525d AT
530d AT
530d xDrive AT
530i AT
530i xDrive AT
540d xDrive AT
540i xDrive AT
M550d xDrive AT
2.5iR-S
2.5iR-V
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1526 L / 53.9 cu-ft
570 L / 20.1 cu-ft ~ 1700 L / 60.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322-345 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1475 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4945 mm / 194.7 in
4775 mm / 188.0 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1630.0 mm / 64.2 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2975 mm / 117.1 in
2780 mm / 109.4 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30 ~ 0.33
Electric Range
53.0 km / 32.9 mi
Fuel Economy
10.8 L/100km / 21.8 MPG (urban)
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
71.5 mm / 2.8 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
2002 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
69%
80%
39%
Pros
- Great styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent handling
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- New range of much-improved engines
- Modern styling
- Clean styling
- Wonderful range of I6 engines
- Robust powertrain
- Double-wishbone suspensions all around
Cons
- Limited to low speed
- Only available with small engines
- Manual in limited availability
- Better engines limited to AWD
- Not built for luxury
- Somehow reminds one of a hearse
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.