HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Peugeot 308 SW III vs Volvo V60 facelift vs Peugeot 508 SW II

Variants
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225
D2
D2
D2 AT
D2 AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 163PS AWD AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 181PS AWD AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
D5 231PS AWD Hybrid
D6 285PS AWD Hybrid
D6 288PS AWD Hybrid
Polestar 2.0 T6 AWD AT
Polestar 3.0 T6 AWD AT
T2 AT
T3 150PS
T3 150PS AT
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 240PS AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 2.0 AT
T6 2.0 AWD AT
T6 3.0 AWD AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 PHEV
2.0 BlueHDi 160 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
GT
PSE

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 1780 L / 62.9 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.5 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.2 kWh (gross)

Dimensions

Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1484 mm / 58.4 in
1420 mm / 55.9 in
Size | Length
4636 mm / 182.5 in
4635 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
Wheelbase
2732 mm / 107.6 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.277
0.29
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Production

Availability
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
31%
37%
51%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Nice Polestar exterior design
  • Very handsome styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved exterior styling
  • Improved interior appointment
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Losing I5 and I6 engines
  • Lowered engine reliability
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.