Compare Fiat 500 facelift vs Ford Focus 4 vs Ford Focus 3

Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155
1.0 EcoBoost 85
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 182
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
ST 2.0 EcoBlue
ST 2.3 EcoBoost
ST 2.3 EcoBoost AT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182
1.5D 120
1.5D 95
1.5D 105
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 EcoBoost 182
1.6D 105
1.6D 115
1.6D 115
1.6D 95
1.6 105
1.6 125
1.6 125 AT
1.6 85
2.0D 140
2.0D 140 AT
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 163
2.0D 163 AT
RS 350 AWD
ST 250
ST TDCi 185

Capacity

Passengers
4
5
5

Chassis

Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Multi-link

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
325.0 V

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
112 mm / 4.4 in
Size | Width
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1553.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.362
Towing Capacity
300 kg / 661 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score
25%
61%
55%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Strong styling
  • Independent rear suspensions
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Potent engine lineup
  • Fully independent suspensions
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Only available with small engines
  • Generic design

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.