HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Fiat 500 facelift vs Hyundai i20 vs Mazda 2 III

Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
1.0 T-GDi 100
1.0 T-GDi 100 DCT
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.0 T-GDi 120 DCT
1.2 MPi
i20 N
1.5 SkyActiv-D
1.5 SkyActiv-G 115
1.5 SkyActiv-G 75
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 950 L / 33.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
0.0 L / 0.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
44.0 L / 11.6 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Payload
430 kg / 948 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 320 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 262 mm
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.6 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1495 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4060 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in | 1983 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Weight
1190.0 kg / 2623.5 lbs
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.9 m / 111.2 ft
CO2 Emission
158 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.362
0.29
Fuel Economy
7.0 L/100km / 33.6 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
229.0 km/h / 142.3 mph
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
515 kg / 1135 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
25%
35%
26%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Low build quality
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.