Compare Volkswagen Up facelift vs SEAT Leon 4 vs Mercedes B-Class W247

Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii facelift Hatchback (2016)

Mercedes-Benz B-Class W247 Hatchback (2018)

Volkswagen | Cars

SEAT | Cars

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

Variants

1.0 60

1.0 60 ASG

1.0 75

1.0 75 ASG

1.0 75 Euro6d

1.0 EcoFuel 68

1.0 EcoFuel 68 Euro6d

1.0 MPI 65

1.0 TSI 90

1.0 TSI 90 Euro6d

GTI

GTI Euro6d

1.0 eTSI DSG

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 90

1.4 e-HYBRID DSG

1.5 eTSI DSG

1.5 TGI

1.5 TGI DSG

1.5 TSI 130

1.5 TSI 150

2.0 TDI 115

2.0 TDI 150 DSG

2.0 TSI DSG

B 160

B 180

B 180 DCT

B 180d

B 180d DCT

B 200

B 200 4MATIC DCT

B 200 DCT

B 200d DCT

B 220 4MATIC DCT

B 220 DCT

B 220d 4MATIC DCT

B 220d DCT

B 250 4MATIC DCT

B 250 DCT

B 250e DCT

Capacity

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

13.4 deg

Offroad | Breakover Angle

9.4 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

17.2 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Turning Circle

9.8 m / 32.1 ft

10.5 m / 34.4 ft

11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

12.8 kWh (gross)

15.6 kWh (gross)

Body Style

3-5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

144 mm / 5.7 in

104 mm / 4.1 in

Size | Height

1562 mm / 61.5 in

Size | Length

3600 mm / 141.7 in

4368 mm / 172.0 in

4419 mm / 174.0 in

Track Width | Front

1412.0 mm / 55.6 in

1567.0 mm / 61.7 in

Track Width | Rear

1408.0 mm / 55.4 in

1516.0 mm / 59.7 in

1547.0 mm / 60.9 in

Wheelbase

2729 mm / 107.4 in

Performance

Electric Range

58.0 km / 36.0 mi

70.0 km / 43.5 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.6:1

Engine | Displacement

1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc

Transmission | Gears

6 / 7 / 8-speed

Transmission | Type

Manual / automatic / DCT

Production

Debut

2018 Paris Auto Show

Reviews

Neofiliac score

17%

27%

Pros

Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Low official fuel consumption
Less ugly than before

Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Better-looking than before

Cons

Horrible performance
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
Poor suspension setup

Poorly built
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
Utilitarian

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.