Compare Volkswagen Up facelift vs SEAT Leon 4 vs Lexus CT 200h
Variants
1.0 60
1.0 60 ASG
1.0 75
1.0 75 ASG
1.0 75 Euro6d
1.0 EcoFuel 68
1.0 EcoFuel 68 Euro6d
1.0 MPI 65
1.0 TSI 90
1.0 TSI 90 Euro6d
GTI
GTI Euro6d
1.0 eTSI DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 e-HYBRID DSG
1.5 eTSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TSI DSG
Euro6
Euro5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft ~ 985 L / 34.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.9 L / 7.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
12.8 kWh (gross)
Body Style
3-5-door Hatchback
5-door hybrid Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
144 mm / 5.7 in
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Length
3600 mm / 141.7 in
4368 mm / 172.0 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1412.0 mm / 55.6 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1408.0 mm / 55.4 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.8 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Electric Range
58.0 km / 36.0 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
2ZR-FXE
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Power
99.0 hp / 73.8 kW @ 5200 rpm + 82.0 hp / 61.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Specific Output
55.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
7%
17%
31%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Poorly built
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Poor handling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.