Compare Volkswagen Up facelift vs Alfa Romeo MiTo vs Skoda Fabia 3

Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii facelift Hatchback (2016)

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) Hatchback (2008-2013)

Skoda Fabia 3 (NJ) Hatchback (2014-2021)

Volkswagen | Cars

Alfa Romeo | Cars

Skoda | Cars

Variants

1.0 60

1.0 60 ASG

1.0 75

1.0 75 ASG

1.0 75 Euro6d

1.0 EcoFuel 68

1.0 EcoFuel 68 Euro6d

1.0 MPI 65

1.0 TSI 90

1.0 TSI 90 Euro6d

GTI

GTI Euro6d

0.9 TwinAir 105

0.9 TwinAir 85

1.3 JTD 90

1.3 JTD 85

1.4

1.4 MPI

1.4 TB MultiAir 105

1.4 TB MultiAir 135

1.4 TB 120

1.4 TB 155

1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT

1.4 TB MultiAir 170

1.6 JTD

1.0 60

1.0 75

1.0 60 2019+

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 110 2018+

1.0 TSI 110 DSG

1.0 TSI 110 DSG 2018+

1.0 TSI 95

1.0 TSI 95 2018+

1.0 TSI 95 DSG 2020+

1.2 TSI 110

1.2 TSI 110 DSG

1.2 TSI 90

1.4 TDI 105

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

330 L / 11.7 cu-ft ~ 1150 L / 40.6 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent, Torsion

Turning Circle

9.8 m / 32.1 ft

10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

3-5-door Hatchback

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

144 mm / 5.7 in

Size | Height

1467 mm / 57.8 in

Size | Length

3600 mm / 141.7 in

Size | Width

1720 mm / 67.7 in

Track Width | Front

1412.0 mm / 55.6 in

1483.0 mm / 58.4 in

Track Width | Rear

1408.0 mm / 55.4 in

1475.0 mm / 58.1 in

Wheelbase

2511 mm / 98.9 in

2470 mm / 97.2 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Displacement

1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc

Reviews

Neofiliac score

25%

14%

Pros

Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Low official fuel consumption
Beautiful design

Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

Horrible performance
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
Poor suspension setup

No powerful engine options
Very tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.