HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford Focus 4 facelift vs Ford Fiesta 7 vs Peugeot 207

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155
1.0 EcoBoost 155 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280
ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 100 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 140
1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 95
1.1 70
1.1 85
1.1 Ti-VCT 75
1.5D 120
1.5D 85
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3- / 5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
133 mm / 5.2 in
Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Width
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2493 mm / 98.1 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM

Production

Availability
2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score
34%
19%
8%
Pros
  • Good handling
  • Decent build quality
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Generic styling
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.