Compare Ford Fiesta 7 facelift vs Ford Focus 4 vs Ford Focus 3

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 Hybrid
1.0 EcoBoost 125 Hybrid AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155 Hybrid
1.1 75
ST 1.5 EcoBoost 200
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155
1.0 EcoBoost 85
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 182
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
ST 2.0 EcoBlue
ST 2.3 EcoBoost
ST 2.3 EcoBoost AT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182
1.5D 120
1.5D 95
1.5D 105
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 EcoBoost 182
1.6D 105
1.6D 115
1.6D 115
1.6D 95
1.6 105
1.6 125
1.6 125 AT
1.6 85
2.0D 140
2.0D 140 AT
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 163
2.0D 163 AT
RS 350 AWD
ST 250
ST TDCi 185

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
292 L / 10.3 cu-ft ~ 1093 L / 38.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Multi-link

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
325.0 V

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
112 mm / 4.4 in
Size | Width
1735 mm / 68.3 in | 1941 mm / 76.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 1783 mm / 70.2 in (mirror folded)
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1504.0 mm / 59.2 in
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
1553.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheelbase
2493 mm / 98.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
300 kg / 661 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM

Production

Availability
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
6%
61%
55%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to drive
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Strong styling
  • Independent rear suspensions
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Potent engine lineup
  • Fully independent suspensions
Cons
  • Very bad performance
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Very basic suspension setup
  • Only available with small engines
  • Generic design

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.