Compare Citroen C1 II 3-door vs Citroen C4 vs Citroen C3 III facelift

Citroen C1 II 3-door

Citroen C4

Citroen C3 III facelift

Citroen C1 II 3-doorCitroen C4Citroen C3 III facelift
Variants
1.0 69
1.0 69 AT
1.2 82
1.0 72
1.0 72 Euro6d
1.4 88
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 109 AT
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 THP 140 AT
1.6 THP 150
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
1.6i 109
1.6i 109 AT
2.0 HDi 136 5MP
2.0 HDi 136 6MP
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0i 140
2.0i 140 AT
1.2 110
1.2 110 AT
1.2 83
1.5 HDi 102

Reviews

Neofiliac score12%16%8%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Ugly
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.