HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Twizy vs BMW i3 LCI vs Renault Twingo III facelift

Variants
33.2 kWh
33.2 kWh Range Extender
42.2 kWh
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
31 L / 1.1 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
9.0 L / 2.4 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
216 kg / 476 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 214 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 204 mm
Ventilated discs
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
MacPherson, Transverse stabilizer
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 125/80 R13 Rear wheel tires: 145/80 R13
Turning Circle
6.8 m / 22.3 ft
9.9 m / 32.3 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
6.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Body Style
2-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
139 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1454 mm / 57.2 in
1598 mm / 62.9 in
Size | Length
2338 mm / 92.0 in
4011 mm / 157.9 in
Size | Width
1237 mm / 48.7 in | 1381 mm / 54.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1094.0 mm / 43.1 in
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1080.0 mm / 42.5 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Weight
474.0 kg / 1045.0 lbs
Wheelbase
1686 mm / 66.4 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2492 mm / 98.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.64
Top Speed
80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph, 80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph (EV mode)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Power
17 hp / 12.7 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
28%
11%
3%
Pros
  • Very small turning circle
  • Fun looks
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Very small turning circle
Cons
  • Not a real car
  • Horrid 0.64 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Very little cargo space
  • Very, very ugly
  • Nonsense positioning
  • Greenwashing
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Miserable electric range
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • The bus is much better

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.