Compare Renault Twingo III facelift vs BMW i3 LCI vs BMW i3 I01

Variants
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
33.2 kWh
33.2 kWh Range Extender
42.2 kWh
22 kWh
22 kWh + Range Extender

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
9.0 L / 2.4 gal
9.0 L / 2.4 gal
Passengers
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
8.8 m / 28.7 ft
9.9 m / 32.3 ft
9.9 m / 32.3 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
22.0 kWh (gross) | 18.8 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
139 mm / 5.5 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1598 mm / 62.9 in
1578 mm / 62.1 in
Size | Length
4011 mm / 157.9 in
3999 mm / 157.4 in
Size | Width
1646 mm / 64.8 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2492 mm / 98.1 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
13 g/km
Electric Range
170.0 km / 105.6 mi
Fuel Economy
0.6 L/100km / 392.0 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
150.0 km/h / 93.2 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
11%
6%
Pros
  • Very small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Over low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Miserable electric range
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • The bus is much better
  • Very, very ugly
  • Nonsense positioning
  • Greenwashing
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Miserable electric range
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.